Legal Opinion
Guthy-Renker Fitness, L.L.C. v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided March 16, 1998No. CV-97-7681 LGB(Ex)PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*268ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO TRANSFER, DISMISS OR STAY •
BAIRD, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78 and Central District of California Local Civil Rule 7.11, the Court dispensed with oral argument on Defendants’ Motion to Transfer, Dismiss or Stay, and took it under submission. Having reviewed all pertinent papers on file and for the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby DENIES Defendants’ Motion.
II. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Guthy-Renker Fitness, LLC (“Plaintiff’) is purportedly manufacturing an elliptical exercise machine (the “POWER TRAIN”)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Alltrade, Inc. v. Uniweld Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Pacesetter Systems, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. And Med Rel Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Saes Getters S.P.A. v. Aeronex, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2002
- Butler v. DIRECTSAT USA, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Nutrition & Fitness, Inc. v. Blue Stuff, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2003
- Intersearch Worldwide, Ltd. v. Intersearch Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Inherent. Com v. Martindale-HubbellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.