Legal Opinion
In Re Armitage
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided November 9, 2006No. 2004-454PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
917 A.2d 437 (2006)
2006 VT 113
In re Appeal of ARMITAGE et al.
No. 04-454.
Supreme Court of Vermont.
November 9, 2006.
Motion for Reargument and Motion for Clarification Denied January 4, 2007.
Stephanie J. Kaplan, East Calais, for Appellants.
Vincent A. Paradis and Daniel P. O'Rourke of Bergeron, Paradis & Fitzpatrick, LLP, Essex Junction, for Appellees.
Present: REIBER, C.J., DOOLEY, JOHNSON, SKOGLUND and BURGESS, JJ.
¶ 1. BURGESS, J.
Interested neighbors ("neighbors") appeal an Environmental Court order granting Pittsford Enterprises, LLP and Joan S. Kelly ("applicants") a conditional use permit and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Application of CarrierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- Berlin Convalescent Center, Inc. v. StonemanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- Trickett v. OchsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- State v. CNA Ins. CompaniesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- Scott v. City of NewportSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- In re Woodstock Community Trust and Housing Vermont PRDSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- In Re Sisters & Bros. Investment Group, LLPSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- In Re Dunkin Donuts S.P. ApprovalSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- In Re Jolley AssociatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.