In Re Sisters & Bros. Investment Group, LLP
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
Reiber, CJ.
¶ 1. Appellant, a convenience store (Cumberland Farms), appeals from an Environmental Court decision recognizing a developer’s (Sisters and Brothers Investment Group, or “SBI”) vested right to apply under the terms of a since-repealed zoning regulation to construct a competing convenience store in Colchester. We affirm.
¶ 2. We recounted many of the underlying facts in a prior appeal involving SBI and the Town of Colchester. See In re Sisters & Brothers Inv. Group, No. 2004-495 (Vt. May 5, 2005) (unreported mem.), available at http://vermontjudiciary.org/d-upeo/ eo04-495.mht.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re Glen M.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- In Re Stowe Club HighlandsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
- Appeal of WeeksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- Smith v. Winhall Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
- In Re ArmitageSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- In re Chaves A250 Permit ReconsiderSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- In re All Metals Recycling, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- In Wright & Boester Conditional Use Application (Day Patterson and Janet Showers, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2021
- In re Lathrop Ltd. Partnership ISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.