Legal Opinion

In Re Sisters & Bros. Investment Group, LLP

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 29, 2009No. 2008-273PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reiber, CJ.

¶ 1. Appellant, a convenience store (Cumberland Farms), appeals from an Environmental Court decision recognizing a developer’s (Sisters and Brothers Investment Group, or “SBI”) vested right to apply under the terms of a since-repealed zoning regulation to construct a competing convenience store in Colchester. We affirm.

¶ 2. We recounted many of the underlying facts in a prior appeal involving SBI and the Town of Colchester. See In re Sisters & Brothers Inv. Group, No. 2004-495 (Vt. May 5, 2005) (unreported mem.), available at http://vermontjudiciary.org/d-upeo/ eo04-495.mht.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re Glen M.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. In Re Stowe Club HighlandsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  3. Appeal of WeeksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  4. Smith v. Winhall Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 1981
  5. In Re ArmitageSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  2. In re Chaves A250 Permit ReconsiderSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  3. In re All Metals Recycling, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  4. In Wright & Boester Conditional Use Application (Day Patterson and Janet Showers, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2021
  5. In re Lathrop Ltd. Partnership ISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API