Legal Opinion

In Re Dunkin Donuts S.P. Approval

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 23, 2008No. 07-468PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Damartin Quadros appeals the Environmental Court’s ruling that he must file a motion under Vermont Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) before the court will consider his *584proposed addition of a drive-through window to a Dunkin Donuts restaurant and retail store at 47-51 Berlin Street in Montpelier, Vermont. We reverse.

¶2. The facts which follow are undisputed. In 2001, Quadros applied to the Montpelier Planning Commission to replace a building at 47-51 Berlin Street with a Dunkin Donuts restaurant and retad store, including a drive-through window. The Planning Commission denied this application…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. In Re Application of CarrierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. In Re Stowe Club HighlandsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
  4. Faulkner v. Caledonia County Fair Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  5. In Re ArmitageSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  2. In Re JLD Properties of St. Albans, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  3. In Re Appeal of McGrewSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  4. Tschaikowsky v. TschaikowskySupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
  5. In re Lathrop Ltd. Partnership ISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API