In Re Dunkin Donuts S.P. Approval
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Damartin Quadros appeals the Environmental Court’s ruling that he must file a motion under Vermont Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) before the court will consider his *584proposed addition of a drive-through window to a Dunkin Donuts restaurant and retail store at 47-51 Berlin Street in Montpelier, Vermont. We reverse.
¶2. The facts which follow are undisputed. In 2001, Quadros applied to the Montpelier Planning Commission to replace a building at 47-51 Berlin Street with a Dunkin Donuts restaurant and retad store, including a drive-through window. The Planning Commission denied this application…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- In Re Application of CarrierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
- In Re Stowe Club HighlandsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Faulkner v. Caledonia County Fair Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- In Re ArmitageSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- In Re JLD Properties of St. Albans, LLCSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
- In Re Appeal of McGrewSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
- Tschaikowsky v. TschaikowskySupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- In re Lathrop Ltd. Partnership ISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.