Kistler Instrumente AG v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Per curiam
This case comes before the court on defendant’s exceptions to the recommended decision of Trial Judge Joseph V. Colaianni, filed August 17, 1979, pursuant to Rule 134(h), having been submitted on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. Upon consideration thereof, since the court agrees with the trial judge’s recommended decision, as hereinafter set forth,* it hereby affirms and adopts the decision as the basis for its judgment in this case and, accordingly, plaintiff is entitled to recover with judgment entered for plaintiff as set forth in the following Conclusion of Law.
OPINION OF TRIAL…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Application of Newsome W. GayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gary E. Rhine v. Casio, Incorporated and Casio Computer Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Telectronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Laryngeal Mask Co. Ltd. v. AmbuCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Telectronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Abbott GmbH & Co. KG v. Yeda Research & Development Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.