Hotchner v. Neon Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Circuit Judge.
Fred Hotchner, inventor and co-owner of certain patents for an animated border for advertising clocks, brought suit against Neon Products, Inc., a sign manufacturer and licensee under those patents, for an accounting for royalties and judgment under the license contract embodied in Exhibits “A,” “B” and “C” of the complaint, and for damages claimed to occur from defendant’s breach of the contract in failing to supply monthly statements of sales, royalties, etc., in detail, as provided therein.
Neon denied that it owed Hotchner any money under the contract up to May 1942,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Canadian Nat. Ry. Co. v. George M. Jones Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- Co-Operative Stores Co. v. United States Fidelity Guaranty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
- United Steed Co. v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1920
- Hurin v. Electric Vacuum Cleaner Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Berks Title Insurance v. HaendigesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1984
- Costin v. Midwest Vision Partners, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Walker v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1965