United Steed Co. v. Casey
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio; D. C. Westenhaver, Judge. Action by John E. Casey and another,' doing business as the John F. Casey Company against the United Steel Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
DONAHUE, Circuit Judge.
On the 4th day of September, 1915, the United Steel Company entered into a contract in writing with the John F. Casey Company, by the terms of which the latter company agreed to do certain excavating, grading, back-filling, and concreting at fixed and definite prices per cubic yard. This contract was signed-*890on the part of the United Steel Company by S. R. Smythe, engineer, and on the part of the Casey Company by John F. Casey.
The Casey Company completed this contract September 23, 1916, and later commenced an action against the Steel Company to recover $112,295.99 for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Columbus Railway, Power & Light Co. v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Simpson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Lingenfelder v. Wainwright Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- King v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Blakeslee v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Warren Bros. Roads Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
- Rockwell International Corp. v. Regional Emergency Medical Services of Northwest Ohio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Hoffman v. GlockCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Brian Construction & Development Co. v. BrighentiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.