Legal Opinion
Canadian Nat. Ry. Co. v. George M. Jones Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 30, 1928No. 4985PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENLOOPER, District Judge.
Plaintiff and defendant in error, hereinafter referred to respectively as the railway company and the coal company, entered into a contract on November 25, 1921, for the sale to the railway company of 150,000 tons of run of mine coal from the Hocking district, deliveries to commence April 1, 1922, and to be continued in installments throughout the then ensuing year ending March 31, 1923. The present controversy arises from the price provision in the contract, that the price should be “the same as paid seller by other railroads on contract for mine run coal from…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Law v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Rankin v. Fidelity Insurance, Trust & Safe Deposit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Hathaway v. First National Bank of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Uinta Tunnel, Min. & Transp. Co. v. Ajax Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co. v. LillardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Johnson v. Igleheart Bros.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
- Hunt v. Triplex Safety Glass Co. of North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Columbia Gas Const. Co. v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
- American Nat. Red Cross v. Raven Honey Dew MillsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Interstate Plywood Sales Company, a Corporation v. Interstate Container Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.