Duell v. Sanstrom

BISHOP, J., pro tem.

We are of the opinion that the amended complaint does not state a cause of action against respondents, and' that the judgment entered, after respondents’ demurrer was sustained without leave to amend, should be affirmed. Only the defendants B. H. Dyas and B. H. Dyas Corporation are respondents on this appeal, as the judgment appealed from did not affect the interests of the other defendants.

In their amended complaint appellants allege that they had a contract with defendant Sanstrom, wherein they agreed to organize a corporation to take over and expand his activities in…