Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Security Trust & Savings Bank

California Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1928No. Docket No. L.A. 9154PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

The above-entitled action was commenced in the superior court in and for the county of Los Angeles by the assignees of a contract to recover damages from the vendor of the property alleged to have been suffered by said assignees by reason of statements negligently made by said owner to said assignees as to the condition of the title of said real property. The facts are stated below:

The second amended complaint, which the trial court held did not state a cause of action, and accordingly entered a judgment of dismissal of the action, from which judgment this appeal was taken, alleged that…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. California Toll Bridge AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Metzenbaum v. MetzenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Ulwelling v. Crown Coach Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Vilardo v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Feldesman v. McGovernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API