Legal Opinion
General Railway Signal Co. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 13, 1979No. Civ. A. 77-657PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN LEWIS SMITH, Jr., District Judge.
OPINION
Plaintiff, General Railway Signal Company (GRS), brings this action to set aside the administrative determination of defendant, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), that the Contracting Officer had not taken an unreasonable amount of time in processing GRS’s two claims for extra work required by changes that WMA-TA ordered in its original contract. GRS filed its first request for payment of the double break circuitry claim on August 14, 1972, and completed the double break circuitry work in August of 1973. It filed its first…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crowder v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1964
- Conn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
3Cited by8 opinions
- District of Columbia v. Pierce Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Texas State Commission v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Granite-Groves v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Excavation Construction, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
- Expressway Construction, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.