Legal Opinion

Conn v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 14, 1966No. 158-61PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:*

Tbis opinion is not concerned with the merits of this action. By agreement and at the request of the parties the sole question presented for decision at this time is the extent to which the plaintiffs’ several claims are time-barred.

A brief discussion of the development of the case into its present posture is appropriate, especially in view of the age of the case and the fact that the defendant has yet to file an answer.

The suit arises out of eleven contracts, identical in all relevant respects, awarded plaintiffs between May 21, 1952 and July 24, 1952, by the Army Corps of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Crown Coat Front Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc., a Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  5. Northern Metal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McKee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
  2. Jaffe v. NoceraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. General Railway Signal Co. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1979
  4. Wentworth v. Warren (In Re Warren)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API