Legal Opinion

Miller v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 31, 1990No. C-2-84-1056PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KINNEARY, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court to consider the motion of the defendant, Harnischfeger Industries, Inc. (Harnischfeger”), for summary judgment. The plaintiff, Faye L. Miller, seeks damages from defendants Harnischfeger and Dynascan Corporation (“Dynascan”) as a result of a fatal accident befalling her husband, Eugene F. Miller, on July 24, 1982. The decedent worked for the Hannibal, Ohio plant of Consolidated Aluminum Corporation (“CONALCO”) as an operator of an overhead crane (“Crane # 22”) manufactured by Harnischfeger, the radio control system…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hawley v. Dresser Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
  2. Quappe v. EndryDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
  3. Snow v. Harnischfeger Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
  4. Phillips v. Langston Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
  5. Hall v. Harnischfeger Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API