Legal Opinion
Hall v. Harnischfeger Corp.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 21, 1991No. 1:90CV1751PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION
MANOS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Woodrow Hall, filed the above-captioned case against defendant, Har-nischfeger Corp., alleging that he sustained injuries when his leg was crushed by a crane the defendant manufactured. He claims that the defendant is strictly liable because his injuries were proximately caused by the defective condition of the crane. Jurisdiction is appropriate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. On December 10, 1990, the defendant moved for summary judgment based on the assertion that Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 2305.131 (Anderson 1991), the Ohio statute of repose,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burmaster v. Gravity Drainage Dist. No. 2Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Sedar v. Knowlton Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Daniel C. Adair v. The Koppers Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Fritz v. Otis Elevator Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Miller v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
3Cited by2 opinions
- Snow v. Harnischfeger Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
- Phillips v. Langston Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999