Eames v. Board of Com'rs
Utah Supreme Court
Proceedings by Ezra Eames to prohibit and restrain the Board of County Commissioners of Cache County from proceeding further in attempting the organization of an irrigation district.
1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.
Plaintiff seeks by this proceeding to prohibit and restrain the board of county commissioners of Cache county, Utah, from proceeding further in the attempted organization of a certain irrigation district in said county, more fully described in plaintiff’s complaint. The question presented for our consideration arises on defendant’s demurrer to the complaint.
The organization of the contemplated district is by virtue of the authority conferred by chapter 68, Sess. Laws Utah 1919, and as the complaint, with its exhibits, is exceedingly voluminous, we are of the opinion that both time and space…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Board of Directors of Modesto Irrigation District v. TregeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Central Irrigation District v. De LappeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Sim v. RosholtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- Directors of Fallbrook Irrigation District v. AbilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cox v. LaycockUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- In re Gray and RiceUtah Supreme Court · 2021
- Parry v. Bonneville Irr. Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1928
- Surrage v. McKayUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- Price v. Water Dist. No. 8Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.