Legal Opinion

Parry v. Bonneville Irr. Dist.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1928No. 4557PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHansen, J.

This is a suit in equity brought by the plaintiff to enjoin the defendants from collecting assessments which have been levied upon plaintiff’s land and also to enjoin the defendants from hereafter levying any assessments upon such land. The defendant Bonneville irrigation district is a municipal corporation organized in 1920 pursuant to the provisions of Laws Utah 1919, c. 68. The lands of the Bonneville irrigation district are situated in Davis county, Utah. The defendants George E. Holt, Clarence Winegar, and Richard S. Stevenson were at the time this suit was begun the county commissioners…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Great Southern Life Insurance v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. In re Organization & of the Bonds of the Central Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co. v. Northumberland County CommissionersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Kimball v. Grantsville CityUtah Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Re Harper Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Plutus Min. Co. v. Orme, County Com'rs.Utah Supreme Court · 1930
  2. State Ex Rel. State Land Board v. BlakeUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Argyle v. Bonneville Irr. Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API