Legal Opinion

Price v. Water Dist. No. 8

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 16, 1930No. 21145PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

The plaintiffs in error (hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs) filed an action in the district court of Tulsa county against the defendants in error (hereinafter referred to as defendants) to enjoin the levying of assessments against the property of plaintiffs in water district No. 8, Tulsa county, to have said water improvement district declared to be nonexistent, to remove any cloud on the property of the plaintiffs caused by the creation of the water improvement district, to enjoin the attempted levying of assessments thereon, and for other relief., Water district No. 8, Tulsa county,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weber v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Spaulding v. North San Francisco Homestead & RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Coyle v. Board of Com'rs of Kay CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Mulligan v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Eames v. Board of Com'rsUtah Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Holt v. Board of County Com'rs of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. Wrightsman v. StevensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API