Wing v. Commercial & Savings Bank
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Mason. (McMahon, J.) Bill to cancel a promissory note, and to restrain the further prosecution of an action at law thereon. Defendants-appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.
In the early part of April, 1892, Charles T. Sawyer and Don F. Cargill obtained from one Charles Mears, of Chicago, an option for the purchase of about 2,000 acres of land lying immediately north of the city limits of Ludington, Mich., for the sum of $15,000. They then held a conference at the office of the defendant bank with the defendant Fuller, who was the cashier of the said bank, and the complainant, Charles G. Wing, at which it was agreed that the four parties named should organize themselves into a body corporate, purchase said lands, and engage in a scheme for developing the city of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hirschmann v. Iron Range & Huron Bay RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by9 opinions
- Union Savings & Trust Co. v. KrummWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Lonergan v. Highland Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Sherwood v. Home Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Armstrong v. Chemical Nat. Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- Blanchard v. Commercial Bank of TacomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.