Legal Opinion

Huntoon v. Brendemuehl

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 12, 1913No. Nos. 18,463—(125)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action in the district court for Clay county to recover $179.90 upon a promissory note. The facts are stated in the opinion. The case was tried before Nye, J., who denied motions to return a directed verdict in favor of each party, and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of defendant. From an order granting plaintiff’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Dibell, C.

This action was brought to recover upon a promissory note made by the defendants to the plaintiff’s assignor. The defendants sought to set off damages for a breach of a contract of bailment made by the predecessor in title of the plaintiff. The jury found for the defendants. The court, upon an alternative motion for judgment or for a new trial, granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The defendants appeal.

1. The defendants admitted liability upon the note, leaving for determination their right to set off damages arising from the breach of the contract of bailment.

In the fall…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stewart v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1871

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fauci v. MulreadyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  2. Sutley v. Polk County State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. C. Gotzian & Co. v. TruszinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Production Credit Ass'n of St. Cloud v. FitzpatrickCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API