Legal Opinion
Pecenka v. Alquest
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided April 17, 1981No. 51,555PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Meyer, J.:
This appeal is from the trial court’s order which dismissed appellants’ case based on the two-year statute of limitations set out in K.S.A. 60-513. Appellants had alleged violations of the veteran’s preference law, K.S.A. 73-201 et seq. [Kansas Statutes Annotated citations in this opinion pertaining to the veteran’s preference law refer to Volume 5A (Ensley 1980).]
Appellants were originally employed by the Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services (SRS), but were discharged on June 17, 1975, when their jobs were eliminated. Both appellants are veterans of military service.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Temmen v. Kent-Brown Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Williams v. EvansSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Grassie v. MastersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Farmers Insurance v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Hutchinson National Bank & Trust Co. v. EnglishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ingram v. Oneok, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Haag v. Dry Basement, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1987
- Wright v. Kansas Water OfficeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- Wagher v. Guy's Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- Burnett v. Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.