Hufnagel v. Scholp
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
By her bill of complaint Shirley Hufnagel seeks to enforce an agreement alleged to have been made by her grandmother Augusta Schoelling with her father William Hufnagel, that if Hufnagel would (1) have the remains of her (Augusta's) husband removed from a cemetery plot in which he had been buried and reinterred in a crypt in a section of crypts owned by Hufnagel in a certain mausoleum and (2) would agree to inter the remains of Augusta Schoelling upon her death in another of said crypts and (3) would permit Augusta Schoelling, as long as she lived and so desired, to reside in his household or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. HubbellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1855
- Hendershot v. HendershotNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
- Di Girolamo v. Di MatteoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
- Ehling v. DiebertNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
- Kamens v. AndersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Minogue v. LipmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Naimo v. La FianzaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Young v. SabolSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- White v. RisdonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- Harrington v. HarringtonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948