Legal Opinion

Kamens v. Anderson

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 20, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant, as vendor in a contract for the sale of land, has moved to strike out a vendee's bill for specific performance. The contract is signed by the vendor and is signed by the vendee in the following manner: "Isaac Kamens, Agent."

Our statute of frauds does not require a contract for the sale of real estate to be signed by both parties to the contract. The requirement is that it "shall be in writing and signed by the party to be charged therewith, or some other person thereunto by him or her lawfully authorized." The great weight of authority is to the effect that the phrase, "party to be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clement v. Young-McShea Amusement Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
  2. Pruden v. WilliamsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1875
  3. Schenck v. Spring Lake Beach Improvement Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1890
  4. Cohen v. PoolNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1914
  5. Cubberly v. CubberlyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1880

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. K & J Clayton Holding Corp. v. Keuffel & Esser Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  2. Levine v. Lafayette Building Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  3. Di Girolamo v. Di MatteoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  4. Elliott v. OwenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Hufnagel v. ScholpNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API