Dabney v. Dabney
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, P. J.
However reasonable a court’s decision may seem, it must be based on a cause of action. Absent this essential ingredient the court lacks jurisdiction to act.
Here we conclude the probate court erred in ordering a cotenant who is also a trust beneficiary to execute documents for a lot line adjustment. The *381court’s order bears out Professor Witkin’s observation that “the Probate Code is a fertile field for the discovery of jurisdictional limitations.” (2 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (4th ed. 1996) Jurisdiction, § 314, p. 888.) We affirm other portions of the court’s order.
Facts
Sam…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- O'Connor v. Old Republic Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Kyne v. EusticeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Horowitz v. NobleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- In Re Marriage of LeverseeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
3Cited by29 opinions
- Thompson Pacific Construction Inc. v. City of SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- State v. HighCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- Critzer v. EnosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Cuccia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Giorgianni v. CrowleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.