Legal Opinion

Dabney v. Dabney

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 16, 2002No. B155292PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, P. J.

However reasonable a court’s decision may seem, it must be based on a cause of action. Absent this essential ingredient the court lacks jurisdiction to act.

Here we conclude the probate court erred in ordering a cotenant who is also a trust beneficiary to execute documents for a lot line adjustment. The *381court’s order bears out Professor Witkin’s observation that “the Probate Code is a fertile field for the discovery of jurisdictional limitations.” (2 Witkin, Cal. Procedure (4th ed. 1996) Jurisdiction, § 314, p. 888.) We affirm other portions of the court’s order.

Facts

Sam…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. Old Republic Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Kyne v. EusticeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Horowitz v. NobleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. In Re Marriage of LeverseeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Thompson Pacific Construction Inc. v. City of SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. State v. HighCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  3. Critzer v. EnosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Cuccia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Giorgianni v. CrowleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API