Legal Opinion

Roling v. E TRADE SECURITIES, LLC

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 22, 2010No. C 10-0488 MHPPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

MARILYN HALL PATEL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Joseph Roling and Alexander Landvater brought this putative class action against E*Trade Securities LLC (“E*Trade”) alleging breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and violations of California Civil Code sections 1671 and 17200 et seq. Now before the court are E*Trade’s motion to transfer venue and motion to dismiss. Having considered the parties submissions and arguments, and for the reasons set forth below, the court enters the following memorandum and order.

BACKGROUND

E* Trade is an online broker-dealer of stocks and…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Almont Ambulatory Surgery Center, LLC v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  2. Hawkins v. Gerber Products Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2013
  3. Lax v. Toyota Motor Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
  4. Arnett v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
  5. Panthera Rail Car LLC v. Kasgro Rail Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API