Legal Opinion

Myers v. United States

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided October 30, 1992No. 1:09-adr-00001PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DEVINE, Senior District Judge.

In this action arising under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 2671, et seq., defendant United States of America objects to and moves for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order of August 3, 1992. Therein, the magistrate judge granted plaintiff’s motion to more than triple his ad damnum beyond the amount requested in his administrative claim. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this court makes a “de novo determination.” 1

1. Background

The court assumes the parties’ familiarity with the record, and thus recites only those facts necessary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Donna Reilly, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  3. Lizzie Ethel Kielwien v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  4. Santiago Martinez, Et Ux v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. Powers v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Michels v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1993
  2. Lowry v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1997
  3. Milano v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
  4. Kenney v. US Postal ServiceDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2003
  5. Hayden v. GraystoneDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API