Santiago Martinez, Et Ux v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:
We affirm a plaintiff’s judgment under the Federal Tort Claims Act except insofar as we must modify the judgment to limit recovery to the amount of the plaintiff’s previous administrative claim. We reject plaintiff’s argument that the relevant law regarding consideration of inflation in the calculation of damages had changed between the filing of the administrative claim and trial of the lawsuit, and we therefore reject his contention that amendment of the ad damnum clause was properly allowed at trial.
I
Early on the morning of March 27, 1977,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- McMahon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Parker v. Highland Park, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
- Halepeska v. Callihan Interests, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1963
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Donna Reilly, Etc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Antonio Lebron v. United States of America, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- McMichael v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Holloway v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Low v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.