Legal Opinion

Autry v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided July 26, 2000No. 04-99-00660-CRPublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by:

PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.

Charles Autry (“Autry") appeals his sentence, arguing that his trial counsel was ineffective.

The State charged Autry with two counts of aggravated robbery. The State alleged that Autry, wielding a gun, robbed a Circle K. The jury agreed, finding him guilty of both counts. During the punishment phase, the State introduced evidence of extraneous offenses. The jury sentenced him to eighty years of confinement on each count.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Discussion

1. Standard of Review

The constitutional right to counsel means the right to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  4. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Cate v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
  2. Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
  3. Malpica v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2003
  4. Megas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
  5. Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API