Autry v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by:
PHIL HARDBERGER, Chief Justice.
Charles Autry (“Autry") appeals his sentence, arguing that his trial counsel was ineffective.
The State charged Autry with two counts of aggravated robbery. The State alleged that Autry, wielding a gun, robbed a Circle K. The jury agreed, finding him guilty of both counts. During the punishment phase, the State introduced evidence of extraneous offenses. The jury sentenced him to eighty years of confinement on each count.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Discussion
1. Standard of Review
The constitutional right to counsel means the right to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Cate v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
- Hill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Malpica v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2003
- Megas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
- Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.