Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 14, 1999No. 506-97PublishedCited by 1,451 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · McCORMICKMcCORMICK, P.J.

which KELLER, HOLLAND, WOMACK and KEASLER, JJ., joined.

We granted discretionary review in this ease to reexamine, as a matter of state and federal constitutional law, whether to apply the two-prong Strickland v. Washington1 standard or the Ex parte Duffy2 standard to ineffective assistance of counsel claims “alleging a deficiency in attorney performance” at noncapital sentencing proceedings. We hold Strickland applies to these claims.3

*771In Duffy a three-judge plurality of this Court decided, as a matter of federal and state constitutional law, that the “reasonably effective assistance of…

3Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1,451 opinions

  1. Trevino v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Vasquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
  4. Escobedo v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  5. Ex Parte CrowCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005

1,446 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API