Cate v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
Appellant Bobby J. Cate appeals his conviction of aggravated sexual assault by contending in four issues 1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel, 2) the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the verdict that he was the person who committed the crime, 3) the trial court erred in admitting evidence of extraneous offenses at the punishment phase, and 4) the trial court erred in failing to charge the jury with the elements of the extraneous offenses admitted into evidence during the punishment phase. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Background
On the…
3Cases cited38 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Sims v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by101 opinions
- Royerick Washington v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
- Nanez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005
- William Gilmore v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
- Pope v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Ryder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.