Hovenden v. City of Bristow
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.
Complainant, a non-resident of the State of Oklahoma, instituted this suit, as the owner of Special Improvement Bonds, numbered 30 to 37 inclusive, in the denominations of Five Hundred Dollars ($500) each, and alleged that the defendant, City of Bristow, Oklahoma, in accordance with Chapter 173 of the Session Laws of the State of Oklahoma of 1923, 11 Okl.St.Ann. § 81 et. seq., created Street Improvement District No. 30, and issued bonds aggregating Thirty-Four Thousand Five Hundred Five and 79/100 Dollars ($34,505.79), consisting of sixty-nine (69) bonds.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Edwards v. Bates CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Shultz v. Ritterbusch, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Independent School Dist. No. 39 of Creek County v. Exchange National Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Blythe v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- City of McAlester v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Home-Stake Production Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1975
- Weinberg v. Sinclair Refining Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1942
- City of Clinton, ex rel. Schuetter v. First Nat. BankDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1941