Legal Opinion

Hovenden v. City of Bristow

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided August 27, 1940No. 340PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.

Complainant, a non-resident of the State of Oklahoma, instituted this suit, as the owner of Special Improvement Bonds, numbered 30 to 37 inclusive, in the denominations of Five Hundred Dollars ($500) each, and alleged that the defendant, City of Bristow, Oklahoma, in accordance with Chapter 173 of the Session Laws of the State of Oklahoma of 1923, 11 Okl.St.Ann. § 81 et. seq., created Street Improvement District No. 30, and issued bonds aggregating Thirty-Four Thousand Five Hundred Five and 79/100 Dollars ($34,505.79), consisting of sixty-nine (69) bonds.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Bates CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Shultz v. Ritterbusch, County TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Independent School Dist. No. 39 of Creek County v. Exchange National Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Blythe v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. City of McAlester v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Home-Stake Production Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1975
  2. Weinberg v. Sinclair Refining Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1942
  3. City of Clinton, ex rel. Schuetter v. First Nat. BankDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API