Legal Opinion

In re Latimore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 19, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent Sonya Latimore was admitted to the practice of *218law in the State of New York by the Second Judicial Department on March 28, 1984. At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

On January 4, 1996, petitioner Departmental Disciplinary Committee (Committee) served respondent with a Notice and Statement of Charges alleging that she violated Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102 (A) (7) (now [8]) and DR 9-102 (D) and (E) with respect to two unrelated matters. In the first…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. In re SiegelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. In re DanasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. In re PollackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. In re KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re CapocciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re MarshburnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Cobb v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Downtown Acupuncture PC v. State Wide Ins.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API