In re Siegel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent, Daniel Siegel was admitted to the practice of law in New York by the Second Judicial Department on December 21, 1950. At all times relevant herein respondent has maintained and office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
Respondent was charged with 16 violations of the Disciplinary Rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility with regard to four complainants, Alfred Milton, Alice Amodeo, Dorothy Godfrey, and Angela Carter.
Charges One through Three alleged that by not serving a bill of particulars and by not perfecting Alfred Milton’s…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- In re RabinowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re KraftAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- In re FormanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- In re SegalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re KovitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by18 opinions
- In re O'SheaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re YagmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re LeBowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re BenickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.