Legal Opinion

In re Pollack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 10, 1989PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent Michael B. Pollack was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York by the Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department, on October 23, 1974. At all times hereinafter mentioned, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

Respondent was charged with violations of Code of Professional Responsibility DR 1-102 (A) (6); DR 9-102 (A) and 22 NYCRR 603.15 (a) in failing to adequately supervise Elliott H. Pollack with respect to the deposit and handling of funds received on behalf of…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Degen v. SteinbrinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Degen v. . SteinbrinkNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. In re FataAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. KupecWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Reibman v. SenieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re KreitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. In re LatimoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. In re PollackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API