Legal Opinion

In re Capoccia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 31, 2000PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1974 and maintains offices throughout New York. He represents thousands of debtors, many of whom have defaulted on their credit cards and other consumer debts. In defense of the ensuing collection actions, respondent typically asserts one or more of the following affirmative defenses and/or counterclaims: failure to state a cause of action, unconscionability, failure to comply with Personal Property Law §§ 402, 413 and 415, failure to comply with the Federal Truth in Lending Act (15 USC § 1601 et seq.) and failure to comply with General…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Gilberg v. BarbieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Parkhurst v. . BerdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. In re CapocciaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. KiesewetterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. De Ruzzio v. De RuzzioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. First Deposit National Bank v. Van AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Anonymous v. Dobbs Ferry Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Neroni v. FollenderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API