State v. Overman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BOBBITT, Chief Justice.
Defendants set forth eighteen assignments of error and filed a joint brief. Assignments Nos. 4 and 5 are directed to the denial of defendants’ motions to dismiss as in case of nonsuit.
We consider first whether the court erred in denying the motions of Overman, Sr., and Gaynell Overman. Each of these defendants was charged with the crime of accessory after the fact of the felony of rape as set forth in our preliminary statement.
G.S. 14-7 in part provides: “If any person shall become an accessory after the fact to any felony, whether the same be a felony at common law or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. McIntoshSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. . PotterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. SquireSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. McCraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. HortonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Mjornell v. Town of Front RoyalWarren County Circuit Court · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.