State v. King
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
Defendant raises a number of errors in the pretrial and trial proceedings which led to his conviction of first degree murder. He challenges the sufficiency of the indictment, the manner in which he was arraigned, the exercise of prosecutorial discretion, the admission into evidence of his out-of-court statement, denial of his motion to excuse a juror for cause, various evidentiary rulings, a comment of the trial judge to the jury, denial of a mistrial motion for prosecutorial misconduct, and the trial judge’s charge to the jury on motive. We find no reversible error.
I
Defendant…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- State v. SyrianiSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. BraxtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. GladdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. McDowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.