Legal Opinion
McNall v. Mitchell's Estate
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 5, 1914No. Docket No. 142PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error to Gratiot; Searl, J. The claim of B. Frank McNall against the estate of Uriah H. Mitchell, deceased, was allowed in part by the probate court. Edward Sweeney, executor, appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for claimant. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
The claimant presented a claim in the probate court of Gratiot county against the defendant, which was as follows:
“Estate of Uriah H. Mitchell, To B. Frank Mc-Nall, Dr.
“To services in loaning money for said Uriah H. Mitchell, looking up the value and title of lands on which it was loaned, taking and having the care of •said money till it was loaned, collecting the interest on said loans and remitting same to said Uriah H. Mitchell, from A. D. 1884, until the death of said Uriah H. Mitchell, $2,000.”
The claim was tried before the probate judge, who allowed it at the sum of $993.64. An appeal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lamoreaux v. CrevelingMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- McNamara v. Michigan Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Cragin v. GardnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Quillan v. Van Dyke's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Holcomb v. SayersMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jacobs v. KnoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Tuttle v. TeetersNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
- Tolsma v. Tolsma's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1914