Legal Opinion
Olcott v. Delaware Flood Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 26, 1996No. Nos. 92-5242, 93-5147, 93-5148 and 94-5005PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge.
Today, we are called upon to resolve a fourteen year-old federal securities dispute raising choice of law and sanctions issues. Bernard Oleott brought this Rule 10b-5 securities action alleging he was defrauded regarding his 1976-1979 investments in four limited partnerships. After a lengthy pretrial and discovery process, the district court concluded the limitations period had run on Mr. Olcott’s federal claims and dismissed his action in its entirety, including his pendent state claims. Mr. Oleott appeals these dismissals in No. 92-5242.
During the pretrial…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Randy Trainor v. Apollo Metal Specialties, Inc. And Danny PilgrimCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Beltronics USA, Inc. v. Midwest Inventory Distribution, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Olcott v. Delaware Flood Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Kerry Neil EnjadyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Sterlin v. Biomune SystemsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.