Legal Opinion

United States v. Kerry Neil Enjady

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 25, 1998No. 96-2285PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Kerry Neil Enjady appeals Ms conviction by a jury of one count of aggravated sexual abuse, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153, 2241(a)(1) and 2245(2)(A). Defendant asserts prejudicial error in the district court’s admission, under.Fed.R.Evid. 413, of testimony about a prior rape defendant allegedly committed, for three separate reasons: (1) the district court erroneously applied Rule 413 before its effective date; (2) Rule 413 is unconstitutional; and (3) if the rule is constitutional, the district court should have excluded the evidence as unduly prejudicial…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. People v. FalsettaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. United States v. Fred James Lemay, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Wayne Lewis CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. GuardiaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API