Legal Opinion
Williamson v. Hartmann Luggage Co.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided March 26, 1998No. 3-96-1192PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
HIGGINS, District Judge.
The Court has before it the defendant’s motion (filed January 30, 1998; Docket Entry No. 26) for summary judgment, its memorandum (Docket Entry No. 27) in support, the plaintiffs response (filed March 2, 1998; Docket Entry No. 36), and his memorandum (Docket Entry No. 37) in support.
The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiffs claim under 42 U.S.C. § 12117.
For the reasons discussed below, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment shall be granted.
I
The defendant, Lenox, Inc., doing business as Hartmann International and Hartmann Luggage…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Linda M. Kocsis v. Multi-Care Management, Inc., D/B/A Bath Manor Special Care CentreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clark v. City of DublinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Vass v. Riester & Thesmacher Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000
- Eber v. Harris County Hospital DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
- Fritz v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2001
- Merhulik v. Weltman, Weinberg, & Reis Co., LPADistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020