Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided July 11, 1996No. 940488-CAPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORME, Presiding Judge:

Relying on the discovery rule, plaintiff appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing her action on statute of limitations grounds. We conclude plaintiff did not meet her inquiry-notice duty with reasonable diligence and affirm.

FACTS

In 1978, the Norman Anderson Trust Agreement was executed by Norman Anderson, the now-deceased husband of plaintiff Anna Anderson. James Anderson, their son, was named trustee. Plaintiff kept in her possession a copy of the trust agree ment. The primary trust asset was Levi Strauss stock worth approximately two…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Myers v. McDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Higgins v. . CrouseNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Schurtz v. BMW of North America, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Berenda v. LangfordUtah Supreme Court · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Perryman v. Motorist Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Gregory v. ShurtleffUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Hill v. AllredUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. MacRis v. Sculptured Software, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Harper v. Summit CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API