Anderson v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORME, Presiding Judge:
Relying on the discovery rule, plaintiff appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing her action on statute of limitations grounds. We conclude plaintiff did not meet her inquiry-notice duty with reasonable diligence and affirm.
FACTS
In 1978, the Norman Anderson Trust Agreement was executed by Norman Anderson, the now-deceased husband of plaintiff Anna Anderson. James Anderson, their son, was named trustee. Plaintiff kept in her possession a copy of the trust agree ment. The primary trust asset was Levi Strauss stock worth approximately two…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Winegar v. Froerer Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- Myers v. McDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Higgins v. . CrouseNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Schurtz v. BMW of North America, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
- Berenda v. LangfordUtah Supreme Court · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Perryman v. Motorist Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Gregory v. ShurtleffUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- Hill v. AllredUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- MacRis v. Sculptured Software, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
- Harper v. Summit CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.