Legal Opinion

Hill v. Allred

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 2001No. 981562PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

11 Plaintiff Virginia Hill appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of all defendants, with the exception of defendant John Putvin, on her claims of fraud in the purchase of a ranch, based on the expiration of the statute of limitations. This action was filed in August 1997; the underlying events took place in 1989 and 1990. Hill argues that the statute of limitations was tolled under the discovery rule because she could not reasonably have discovered the facts regarding the fraud until after November 1994. We reverse and remand.

BACKGROUND

1 2 The facts…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Higgins v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Myers v. McDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Berenda v. LangfordUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Williams v. State Farm Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Chapman Ex Rel. Chapman v. Primary Children's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. WebBank v. American General Annuity Service Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Russell Packard Development, Inc. v. CarsonUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Holmes Development, LLC v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. Apotex Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Hill v. Estate of AllredUtah Supreme Court · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API