Legal Opinion
Reiner v. Hermann
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 8, 1947No. Civ. 13144PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
After reversing the judgment granting the defendants’ motion based on Code of Civil Procedure, section 437c for a summary judgment and dismissing the plaintiff’s amended complaint, this court granted a rehearing and directed counsel to file memoranda on the subject of the statute of limitations.
The amended complaint, which was designated as a complaint “To Impress Trust on Real and Personal Property and to Recover Possession Thereof,” contains no allegation of fraud, accident, mistake, undue influence or wrongdoing on the part of the plaintiff’s deceased husband, his executor, Milan Dulik,,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Murphy v. CrowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Williams v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Bell v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Luco v. De ToroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- All v. PrillamanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jefferson v. J. E. French Co.California Supreme Court · 1960
- Schrimscher v. BrysonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Zahn v. Canadian Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Yandell v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Chavez v. CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.