Yandell v. Baker
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BRAY, J. *
In this appeal by plaintiffs from summary judgment in favor of defendant Daniel W. Baker, the only question presented is whether, on the motion for summary judgment which was granted on the sole ground that plaintiffs’ alleged cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations, any triable issues of fact were raised. We hold that there were not.
Record
The action is one for malpractice and breach of contract for attorney’s services against defendants Kasch, Lautze & Lautze, certified public accountants, and defendant Baker, an attorney at law. Plaintiffs John W. Yandell and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Lattin v. GilletteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Family Service Agency of Santa Barbara v. AmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Alter v. MichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Hatch v. BushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- International Engine Parts, Inc. v. Feddersen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Adams v. PaulCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Electronic Equipment Express, Inc. v. Donald H. Seiler & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.