Legal Opinion

Gee Automotive Portland I, LLC v. ECT BETT Investments TGH LLC

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided February 26, 2025No. 3:23-cv-01134Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON GEE AUTOMOTIVE Portland I, LLC, et al., Case No. 3:23-cv-01134-AB Plaintiffs, FINDINGS OF FACT & v. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ECT BETT Investments TGH LLC, et al., Defendants. BAGGIO, District Judge: This dispute arises out of two car dealership leases (the “Leases”) between Plaintiffs Gee Automotive VII and Gee Automotive XIII and Defendants BET BETT Investments TGH LLC and ECT BETT Investments TGH LLC.1 The Parties bring declaratory judgment claims and counterclaims asking the Court to interpret Section 13.2 of the Leases, which…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Batzer Construction, Inc. v. John BoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Totten v. New York Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Abercrombie v. Hayden Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API