Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 2006No. 2004-1293PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

{¶ 1} R.C. 3111.13(F)(3)(a), as amended effective October 27, 2000, provides that when a court issues an order requiring a parent to pay current child support, the court shall not require that parent to pay any amount for failure to pay such support before the order if “(i) [a]t the time of the initial filing of an action to determine the existence of the parent and child relationship with respect to that parent, the child was over three years of age,” and “(ii) [pjrior to the initial filing of an action to determine the existence of the parent and child relationship with respect to that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Bielat v. BielatOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Vogel v. WellsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Haskins v. BronzettiOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Tobacco Use Prevention & Control Found. Bd. of Trustees v. BoyceOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Longbottom v. Mercy Hospital ClermontOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Cosby v. Franklin Cty. Dept. of Job Family Servs., 07ap-41 (12-13-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Jarvis v. First Resolution Mgt. Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Johnston v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API