Haskins v. Bronzetti
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
The underlying issue before this court is whether appellant can pursue an action for child support against the appellee in the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County. Appellant suggests that an independent action for child support will lie as against the appellee in Ohio. We agree.
All parents have a duty to support their children. At common law, such an obligation rested primarily upon the father. State ex rel. Wright v. Indus. Comm. (1943), 141 Ohio St. 187, 189-190, 25 O.O. 277, 278, 47 N.E.2d 209, 211. Long ago, in what has become somewhat of a seminal opinion, we observed that:
“The duty…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1943
- Meyer v. MeyerOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- In re Dissolution of Marriage of LazorOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- McDaniel v. RuckerOhio Supreme Court · 1948
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wesley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Smith v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Jarvis v. Witter, Unpublished Decision (12-9-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- In re Adoption of B.I. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
- In re C.R.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006