Tobacco Use Prevention & Control Found. Bd. of Trustees v. Boyce
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, Acting C.J.
{¶ 1} The issue in this case is whether certain sections of 2008 Am.Sub.S.B. No. 192 (“S.B. 192”) and 2008 Sub.H.B. No. 544 (“H.B. 544”) are constitutional. We conclude that the sections are constitutional and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.
Factual and Procedural Background
{¶ 2} In November 1998, the Ohio attorney general entered into a master settlement agreement (“MSA”) with the largest tobacco-product manufacturers in the United States that resolved litigation to recover health-care expenses incurred by the states as a result of tobacco-related illnesses. Pursuant to the MSA,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Jackman v. Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Bielat v. BielatOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Fletcher v. Executive CouncilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Taylor v. First Resolution Invest. Corp. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Toledo v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- State ex rel. Parker Bey v. Byrd (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State ex rel. Harm Reduction Ohio v. OneOhio Recovery Found.Ohio Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. AdkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.