Custom Vehicles, Inc. v. Forest River, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge, in chambers.
Custom Vehicles, the appellant in this trademark litigation, has filed a motion asking the court to strike portions of the appellee’s brief. The motion came to me during my stint as the motions judge. It is now denied — and to show that such absurd motions do not come for free, I deduct twice the length of this motion from the permissible length of the offending-party’s reply brief.
Custom Vehicles believes that its adversary’s brief contains unsupported assertions of fact. Here is the first example from the motion (underlining and italics in original):
•…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Baxter International, Incorporated v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Mario Howard LloydCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Miguel Angel Ramos v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Danny D. FortnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
3Cited by45 opinions
- Erik Redwood and Jude Redwood v. Elizabeth Dobson and Harvey Cato Welch, and Marvin Ira GersteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Uncommon, LLC v. Spigen, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Temple v. Hartford InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2014
- Pruett v. ArizonaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
- Nuzzi v. St. George Community Consolidated School District No. 258District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2010
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.