Legal Opinion

Custom Vehicles, Inc. v. Forest River, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 25, 2006No. 06-2009PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge, in chambers.

Custom Vehicles, the appellant in this trademark litigation, has filed a motion asking the court to strike portions of the appellee’s brief. The motion came to me during my stint as the motions judge. It is now denied — and to show that such absurd motions do not come for free, I deduct twice the length of this motion from the permissible length of the offending-party’s reply brief.

Custom Vehicles believes that its adversary’s brief contains unsupported assertions of fact. Here is the first example from the motion (underlining and italics in original):

•…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baxter International, Incorporated v. Abbott LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. Mario Howard LloydCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Miguel Angel Ramos v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. Danny D. FortnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Erik Redwood and Jude Redwood v. Elizabeth Dobson and Harvey Cato Welch, and Marvin Ira GersteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Uncommon, LLC v. Spigen, Inc.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
  3. Temple v. Hartford InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2014
  4. Pruett v. ArizonaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009
  5. Nuzzi v. St. George Community Consolidated School District No. 258District Court, C.D. Illinois · 2010

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API