Legal Opinion

Erik Redwood and Jude Redwood v. Elizabeth Dobson and Harvey Cato Welch, and Marvin Ira Gerstein

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 7, 2007No. 05-4324, 06-1165PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.

This is a grudge match. Harvey Cato Welch represented Erik Redwood in a criminal prosecution for battery. Redwood was convicted and maintains that Welch is at fault. Redwood wants Welch to sign an affidavit confessing that he supplied ineffective assistance; he believes that with such an affidavit he could have his criminal record expunged. Welch, who believes that his legal work met professional standards, has refused to fall on his sword for Redwood’s benefit. Redwood has retaliated by insulting Welch in public, calling him, among other things, a “shoeshine boy.”…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Ridings v. Riverside Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Flowers v. OwensDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  3. Uppal v. Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine & ScienceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  4. O'Neill v. City of ShorelineCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. Agrawal v. PallmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API